<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popularity vs Influence in Blogging and Social Media: What&#8217;s the Difference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Impact of Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 Things Lady Gaga Can Teach Us About Social Media PR &#38; Online Influence &#124; Montachusett Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-33879</link>
		<dc:creator>4 Things Lady Gaga Can Teach Us About Social Media PR &#38; Online Influence &#124; Montachusett Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-33879</guid>
		<description>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 Things Lady Gaga Can Teach Us About Social Media PR &#38; Online Influence &#187; talkdigitalmarketing.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-29518</link>
		<dc:creator>4 Things Lady Gaga Can Teach Us About Social Media PR &#38; Online Influence &#187; talkdigitalmarketing.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-29518</guid>
		<description>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 Things Lady Gaga Can Teach Us About Social Media PR &#38; Online Influence &#124; THIS IS TRUXST</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-29487</link>
		<dc:creator>4 Things Lady Gaga Can Teach Us About Social Media PR &#38; Online Influence &#124; THIS IS TRUXST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-29487</guid>
		<description>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 Lessons in Social Media Influence from Lady Gaga</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-29328</link>
		<dc:creator>4 Lessons in Social Media Influence from Lady Gaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-29328</guid>
		<description>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] involves much more than a popularity contest.  Actual influence is composed of the ability to influence opinions, outcomes, and actions. While other celebrities like Charlie Sheen are popular on sites such as Twitter, his social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I looking for popularity or influence? &#124; Blog Watch Citizen Media</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-12448</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I looking for popularity or influence? &#124; Blog Watch Citizen Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-12448</guid>
		<description>[...] you naturally have a lot of influence, right? Wrong. Influence involves more than numbers. It involves your ability to influence outcomes, actions, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you naturally have a lot of influence, right? Wrong. Influence involves more than numbers. It involves your ability to influence outcomes, actions, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Measuring social influence</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-12175</link>
		<dc:creator>Measuring social influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-12175</guid>
		<description>[...] sure to get answers from each end of the spectrum. Some will say influence is misconstrued as “popular.” Others believe that follower numbers measure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sure to get answers from each end of the spectrum. Some will say influence is misconstrued as “popular.” Others believe that follower numbers measure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Mattern</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Mattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>Not always. Influence and popularity sometimes go hand-in-hand, but they can exist independently of each other too. For example:

- You can have a &quot;popular&quot; blog (a lot of traffic, a lot of tweets / retweets / shares, etc.), but have very little influence in the sense of being able to change or reinforce opinions or drive your readers to action. A very clear-cut example would be a heavily-promoted splog (spam blog that scrapes content from elsewhere) with no personal connections from the &quot;blogger.&quot; You can get a lot of traffic to the site even if it&#039;s just aggregated material, but the site itself has no influence over readers. At best, the authors of the scraped content have the influence. It&#039;s rarely that clear-cut though. More often you&#039;ll find popular bloggers who just can&#039;t get their audience to take certain actions because the content or style isn&#039;t really designed to do that. 

- You can have a relatively unpopular blog in a narrow niche. You won&#039;t have a lot of readers, but if you&#039;re an authority source in that small niche community, you can still have quite a bit of influence in the niche or industry. Consider a very highly specialized medical condition that might affect only 20,000 people worldwide. Even if every single person affected read the blog, it would never be &quot;popular&quot; by today&#039;s standards. But let&#039;s say that blog is run by one of very few doctors specializing in that area. They&#039;re known as the leading expert on the subject. Even though they may never reach an audience of hundred of thousands (or millions) of readers, they can exercise a lot of influence over the smaller community they &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; reach. 

So no, being influential doesn&#039;t lead to popularity. And popularity doesn&#039;t mean you have influence. And that&#039;s not even considering things like &lt;em&gt;degrees&lt;/em&gt; of influence. For example, getting people to RT something would considered &quot;influence&quot; by some. If that&#039;s the most you have going for you, I&#039;d call that fairly worthless influence. Anyone can do that by being controversial or sharing links to cutsie crap online. Compare that to someone who can regularly get a large audience engaged in supporting a cause, donating to a certain charity, attending live events, etc., and the level of influence is a bit higher. 

Anyone can get people to do something that takes little or no effort if they try (like linking, clicking, or RTing). Not everyone has true influence where they affect people on a deeper level or make a more serious impact on the world, business, or their community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not always. Influence and popularity sometimes go hand-in-hand, but they can exist independently of each other too. For example:</p>
<p>- You can have a &#8220;popular&#8221; blog (a lot of traffic, a lot of tweets / retweets / shares, etc.), but have very little influence in the sense of being able to change or reinforce opinions or drive your readers to action. A very clear-cut example would be a heavily-promoted splog (spam blog that scrapes content from elsewhere) with no personal connections from the &#8220;blogger.&#8221; You can get a lot of traffic to the site even if it&#8217;s just aggregated material, but the site itself has no influence over readers. At best, the authors of the scraped content have the influence. It&#8217;s rarely that clear-cut though. More often you&#8217;ll find popular bloggers who just can&#8217;t get their audience to take certain actions because the content or style isn&#8217;t really designed to do that. </p>
<p>- You can have a relatively unpopular blog in a narrow niche. You won&#8217;t have a lot of readers, but if you&#8217;re an authority source in that small niche community, you can still have quite a bit of influence in the niche or industry. Consider a very highly specialized medical condition that might affect only 20,000 people worldwide. Even if every single person affected read the blog, it would never be &#8220;popular&#8221; by today&#8217;s standards. But let&#8217;s say that blog is run by one of very few doctors specializing in that area. They&#8217;re known as the leading expert on the subject. Even though they may never reach an audience of hundred of thousands (or millions) of readers, they can exercise a lot of influence over the smaller community they <em>do</em> reach. </p>
<p>So no, being influential doesn&#8217;t lead to popularity. And popularity doesn&#8217;t mean you have influence. And that&#8217;s not even considering things like <em>degrees</em> of influence. For example, getting people to RT something would considered &#8220;influence&#8221; by some. If that&#8217;s the most you have going for you, I&#8217;d call that fairly worthless influence. Anyone can do that by being controversial or sharing links to cutsie crap online. Compare that to someone who can regularly get a large audience engaged in supporting a cause, donating to a certain charity, attending live events, etc., and the level of influence is a bit higher. </p>
<p>Anyone can get people to do something that takes little or no effort if they try (like linking, clicking, or RTing). Not everyone has true influence where they affect people on a deeper level or make a more serious impact on the world, business, or their community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huck</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>Huck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-5059</guid>
		<description>A very well thought of and written article. I never got the idea that there is a difference between the two. It is more preferable to be influential than popular. But influence comes along with the bonus of popularity. Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very well thought of and written article. I never got the idea that there is a difference between the two. It is more preferable to be influential than popular. But influence comes along with the bonus of popularity. Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What's Really Wrong With the "LIKE" Buttons &#124; Sharisax Is Out There</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>What's Really Wrong With the "LIKE" Buttons &#124; Sharisax Is Out There</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>[...] Jennifer Mattern studied the difference between influence and popularity in blogging and concluded: &#8220;The relationship between the bloggers and their audiences determines [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jennifer Mattern studied the difference between influence and popularity in blogging and concluded: &#8220;The relationship between the bloggers and their audiences determines [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 of the Best Recent Social Media Tutorials on the Web</title>
		<link>http://socialimplications.com/popularity-vs-influence-in-blogging-and-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>10 of the Best Recent Social Media Tutorials on the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialimplications.com/?p=7#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>[...] certainly have my own biases when picking things &#8212; my dislike of Facebook and the word &#8220;influencer&#8221; would clearly affect how I see social media tutorials in those areas for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] certainly have my own biases when picking things &#8212; my dislike of Facebook and the word &#8220;influencer&#8221; would clearly affect how I see social media tutorials in those areas for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

